In the previous posting I discussed three different
proposals that are currently on the table for reforming our current tax
system. We looked at the Fair Tax, Flat
Tax, and the 999 plan. Any of these
plans would be a definite improvement over the current tax plan. However, as with any change, there will be
resistance. In this posting we will be
looking at some of the major obstacles we are likely to encounter as we strive
to reform the current tax code.
First, we will encounter resistance from the tax preparation
industry. I am a tax preparer and work
for one of the major tax preparation companies during the tax season. I work at this job during the tax season as a
second job to earn extra discretionary income.
In fact, today I am leaving on my vacation using money I earned this
past tax season. I say this because even
though reforming the tax code would likely eliminate my second job, I am
interested in the good of my country and believe these reforms will create
economic growth making it possible for me to earn the discretionary income I
want without having to work a second job.
Even though traditional tax preparation companies such as
H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt, and Liberty Tax have seen a decline over the
past couple of years, (1)
this is most likely due to the introduction of new technologies that enable
taxpayers to prepare their taxes online or use tax software purchased at their
local office supply store. As the tax
code becomes even more complicated due to the implementation of Obamacare, I
believe the traditional tax preparation companies will experience resurgence as
taxpayers become concerned with making a costly mistake on their return.
The introduction of a flat or fair tax threatens to
eliminate the need for the traditional tax preparation industry. There may still be a market for software to
fill out the short form using a computer but these programs will be very simple
thus reducing the price people would be willing to pay for these software
packages. Facing extinction, we would
expect the traditional tax preparation companies to band together and lobby
Congress to maintain the current complicated tax system.
However, if voters speak out for reform in great enough
numbers, the threat of losing an election will far outweigh the threat of
losing campaign contributions from tax preparation companies. Therefore, to overcome this obstacle, we need
massive numbers of voters to speak out for reform.
Another point of resistance to reform could come from those
who fear the loss of refundable tax credits such as the Earned Income Tax
Credit (EITC) and the Additional Child Tax Credit. Many low-income families have grown to become
dependent on these credits, which allow someone who has zero tax liability to
receive a large refund in excess of any withholding taxes they paid. These credits amount to a transfer of money
to these people using the tax code.
In my previous posting I mentioned that the Flat Tax
preserves the EITC so their fears are unfounded if we implement a flat
tax. However, the fair tax does
eliminate the EITC but it also eliminates all withholding taxes including FICA
and Medicare. These individuals will
also receive a prebate check and will benefit from reductions in prices as
companies can cut their prices due to not having to pay corporate income taxes
anymore. We also have to consider the
dynamic of economic growth that will occur raising personal incomes, thus relieving
individuals of dependence on government handouts like the EITC and Additional
child Tax Credits.
Finally, we have to deal with objections from lawmakers
themselves. The current tax code allows
politicians to essentially buy votes by offering tax incentives to preferred
constituencies while punishing disfavored constituencies. (2)
This is why we have seen the tax code grow each year and why it has now become
a leviathan that threatens to choke our economy and as we have seen from the
recent IRS scandal erode away our personal liberties. Add to this the enforcement of Obamacare by
the IRS, and we have a formula for disaster as politicians have even more
opportunities to use the tax code to garner political favors.
So, how can we convince lawmakers that benefit politically
from the complex tax code to vote for its elimination? Simple, we must come out in numbers large
enough that the threat of losing our votes will mean losing their jobs. To put it in a way these politicians can
understand, they can buy our vote by voting to replace our current tax code
with either a fair or a flat tax.
Changing the tax code, as with any change, will have
obstacles but they are obstacles that we can overcome. We can alleviate fears of lower income people
by maintaining the EITC in the flat tax and then explain how the economic
growth due to the enactment of the Fair Tax will raise their incomes to where
they no longer need to be dependent on the EITC. By showing up in massive numbers at tax
reformation rallies, we can convince politicians that the greater threat to
their positions is in us not voting for them and not in the loss of
contributions from tax preparation lobbies or contributions for favors offered
to favored constituencies.
Next, we will look at what we can do to take action to
initiate tax reform.
1. Diligence.com, Magic. Has the Tax
Preparation Industry Lost Its Luster. www.magicdiligence.com. [Online]
Alexander Online Properties, March 16, 2010. [Cited: June 7, 2013.]
http://www.magicdiligence.com/tax-preparation-industry-2010-03.
2. Anthony Davies,
James R. Harrigan. How Pols Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the
Impenetrable Tax Code. www.usnews.com. [Online] U.S. News and World
Report, October 15, 2012. [Cited: June 7, 2013.]
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2012/10/15/why-politicians-dont-want-to-simplify-the-tax-code.
No comments:
Post a Comment