By: Dale Weckbacher
John 14:6
Jesus said to him,
"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except
through Me.
NKJV
The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution says the
following:
Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress
of grievances.
The original purpose of this amendment was to place a
restriction on the government in order to prevent them from passing legislation
prohibiting free speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion. The founders of the United States had fought
a bloody war with the British Empire in order to gain their liberty. The founders understood that power can
corrupt and it was their desire to place limits designed to prevent the new
republic from turning into a government resembling the tyranny from whom they
had won their independence.
As time has passed however, some leaders in government,
corrupted by the power their position grants them, have begun to interpret the
first amendment as empowering the government to restrict religious practices so
as not to offend someone of another religion, or those choosing to be
atheists. This interpretation has led to
court rulings ordering the removal of nativity scenes, the Ten Commandments,
and even prayer in schools and other public places. Anyone daring to display something that
professes their faith in a public place finds themselves asked, or ordered, to
remove it in the interest of tolerance.
In Matthew 10:32-33 Jesus said the following, "32 Therefore
whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who
is in heaven. 33 But whoever denies Me
before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven.” (NKJV)
In other words, anyone professing faith in Jesus Christ as savior is
commanded by scripture to profess or confess their faith before men. Therefore, if some government official or some
legislation prohibits the free expression of faith, it prohibits a Christian
from practicing their faith as outlined in scripture.
On the surface, it might appear that the calling of Christians
is to be intolerant of those of other faiths.
However, Jesus also said the following in the Sermon on the Mount,
“Blessed are the peacemakers, For they shall be called sons of God.” (Matthew 5:9, NKJV) Jesus was a man of peace proven by his
willingness to give his live when he could have, as the Son of God, ordered the
destruction of those that crucified Him.
Those that have dedicated their lives to following Jesus Christ
understand the command to confess and profess their faith but also understand
they are to be peacemakers and profess their faith in a peaceful manner.
The calling of Christians is not to profess their faith through
coercion or force but instead to let their words and deeds demonstrate the
change their relationship with Jesus has made in their lives. The prayer of most Christians is that when people
see the positive change their relationship with Jesus Christ has made in their
lives, they will want a similar relationship.
The founders understood this and it was their desire to preserve the
free expression and practice of religion among the citizens of the country and
therefore proposed and ratified the first amendment to the U.S
Constitution.
Tolerance does not have to mean compromise. If ones religion is beneficial to someone,
their lives should reflect these benefits.
This is where I believe those practicing radical Islam fail. Their religion offers little if any benefit
to others, especially women, and therefore those practicing radical Islam must
use threats of force or coercion to bring others over to their faith.
In addition, the first amendment right to practice ones
religion ends when the practice of one’s religion results in threatening someone’s
right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness as declared in the
Declaration of Independence of the United States. We as citizens of the United States therefore
have no obligation to extend freedom to practice radical Islam in the United
States for as we have seen recently, those practicing radical Islam believe
they are somehow doing god’s will when they behead someone not practicing their
faith thus depriving them of their right to life.
Christianity or any other peaceful religion has first
amendment protection to express and practice their faith in the United
States. However, this does not mean they
must tolerate religions using threats of death, injury, or coercion to convert
others to their faith. Religious
tolerance does not include compromise with religions proselytizing through
force or coercion and we who practice our faiths in a peaceful manner must
stand against these violent religions.
After all, Jesus did teach that peacemakers would see God.
No comments:
Post a Comment